<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A JScript/VBScript Regex Lookahead Bug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug</link>
	<description>A JavaScript and regular expression centric blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mays</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug/comment-page-1#comment-45012</link>
		<dc:creator>mays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug#comment-45012</guid>
		<description>@Craig : that i guess is because of .* wildcard in (?=.*\d) 

Try this 
/(?=^[a-zA-Z0-9]{6,20}$)(?=.+\d).+/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Craig : that i guess is because of .* wildcard in (?=.*\d) </p>
<p>Try this<br />
/(?=^[a-zA-Z0-9]{6,20}$)(?=.+\d).+/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regular expressions and the ASP.NET RegularExpressionValidator control â€“ an overview of useful links</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug/comment-page-1#comment-40811</link>
		<dc:creator>Regular expressions and the ASP.NET RegularExpressionValidator control â€“ an overview of useful links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug#comment-40811</guid>
		<description>[...] JScript/VBScript bug that is also present in Internet Explorer (almost any version): A JScript/VBScript Regex Lookahead Bug [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JScript/VBScript bug that is also present in Internet Explorer (almost any version): A JScript/VBScript Regex Lookahead Bug [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug/comment-page-1#comment-35538</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug#comment-35538</guid>
		<description>ok, my fix didn;t work as it now allows non alphanumeric chars!!!! I&#039;m not sure how something so presumably simple is beginning to turn in an absolute nightmare!!!!!! validate password cross browser simple ? You&#039;d think !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, my fix didn;t work as it now allows non alphanumeric chars!!!! I&#8217;m not sure how something so presumably simple is beginning to turn in an absolute nightmare!!!!!! validate password cross browser simple ? You&#8217;d think !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug/comment-page-1#comment-35535</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug#comment-35535</guid>
		<description>Not sure how relevant this is, but came across an odd issue in IE just now. My validation expression ^(?=.*\d)[a-zA-Z0-9]{6,20}$ worked in FF 3 (didn&#039;t test other browsers except IE 7 where it kept *not* matching &quot;valid&quot; entries.
I changed the curly bracket part specifying the range to (?=.{6,20}) and it worked. Weird? or not? It always worked in FF 3 whichever way but IE only accepted the second way... Don&#039;t have time right now to test other browsers but will revisit this later to test in other browsers as well - unless someone here has the time :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how relevant this is, but came across an odd issue in IE just now. My validation expression ^(?=.*\d)[a-zA-Z0-9]{6,20}$ worked in FF 3 (didn&#8217;t test other browsers except IE 7 where it kept *not* matching &#8220;valid&#8221; entries.<br />
I changed the curly bracket part specifying the range to (?=.{6,20}) and it worked. Weird? or not? It always worked in FF 3 whichever way but IE only accepted the second way&#8230; Don&#8217;t have time right now to test other browsers but will revisit this later to test in other browsers as well &#8211; unless someone here has the time <img src='http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ash's Regex Blog : Looking again at the Lookahead bug</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug/comment-page-1#comment-26127</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ash's Regex Blog : Looking again at the Lookahead bug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/regex-lookahead-bug#comment-26127</guid>
		<description>[...] Levithan looked much closer at the problem in general and discussed it on his blog. He came to the conclusion that the qualifiers with a minimum boundary of zero, within the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Levithan looked much closer at the problem in general and discussed it on his blog. He came to the conclusion that the qualifiers with a minimum boundary of zero, within the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
